Thu 11 Jan 2007
In terms of the portrayal of Plano Texas (a suburb of Dallas referred to in Subdivided), I’ve been pretty supportive of folks there when they were fighting the Wal-Mart a few years back, including in print. I had a sequence in the film about it but took it out because it had become stale, and there are other films critical of Wal-Mart out already. Plano is used as a symbol in the film, though some people will take it for a wholesale bashing. For many people in city neighborhoods, Plano represents the kind of suburbia they do not want anything to do with, and in fact a number of them left there because of the poor state of some of the neighborhoods. They are not all like this, of course.
I also wanted to portray some of the class issues in a subtle way: many of the working class Little Forest Hills residents have an outright dislike for the upper middle class and the “soulless suburbs.” I do not think its entirely defensible or rational, but it was pretty much universal, hence its prominence in the film. It also goes the other way. Looking at the Frisco-online forums you see the opposite perspective: people who react strongly to criticism of their lifestyle of big homes and SUV’s and have little sympathy or interest in the concerns of the bohemian urban dweller. Everybody has blind spots.

So Plano ends up being chosen as a symbol because, well, it was there right in front of me (and I had a lot of photos). But also because I was (a) emotionally offended in that the community spirit where I was living was nil, (b) visually assaulted by the design, and (c) politically offended because a lack of community is bad for democracy. J. S. Mill, I’m paraphrasing here, said that without participation in public life, there is no collective interest and people are not participants in a democracy, they are competitors. John Dewey, one of my preferred philosophers, said “liberty and equality isolated from communal life are abstractions… Democracy must begin at home, and its home is the neighborly community.”
So there’s a two fold response here. One is that the portrayal of Plano in Subdivided is a representation of class perspectives, and ones I do not necessarily share, and two that it is a critique of design, and a message to those developing communities to not make the same mistakes, and to consider other ideas about how to design their communities. The idea is to end up with neighborhoods rather than just subdivisions.
I live very near Plano now and spend a good deal of time there. My son goes to school in Plano. My critique via Subdivided is a way of participating in the civic life, to help generate discussion and debate, and to hopefully help a few people see some things slightly differently.
